Frame type

Web-Tapered Columns: Why Rigid Frames Are Wedge-Shaped

The wedge profile of a metal building column is not styling. It is the member following its own moment diagram — shallow where the bending is small, deep where it peaks. Web-tapered members are why a rigid frame is the lightest practical way to cover a wide bay, and they are the standard configuration for anything clear span.

Tapered Column — sectional elevation. The drawing shows what the panels hide: where the columns are, where they are not, and where the steel gets deep.

Practical span range

40–300 ft

Where this configuration is normally used

Built-up members whose web depth follows the moment diagram - shallow at the base, deep at the haunch. The standard configuration for clear span, and the reason a rigid frame is the lightest way to cover a wide bay.

Skip it when: Interior walls, racking, or liner panel need a flat column face for their full height.

How it works

A rigid frame column carries almost no moment at the base, where a pinned connection lets it rotate, and a great deal at the knee, where it meets the rafter. A constant-depth member has to be sized for the worst point along its length and then carries that depth everywhere, including where nothing needs it.

A built-up tapered member does not. The web is cut to a taper and welded between flanges, so depth grows from base to haunch in step with demand. Nothing is deeper than it needs to be, and the steel that would have been dead weight is simply absent. On a wide frame that is a large fraction of the primary framing weight.

It is also why these are built-up plate members rather than rolled shapes. A rolled beam comes in fixed depths and constant section; a plate girder can be any depth at any point along its length. The whole PEMB industry is built on that freedom, and the tapered column is its clearest expression.

What it costs, and when that changes

Tapered is the cheaper option, and by enough that it is the default at any span above about 60 ft. Below that the weight penalty for a constant-depth column is small enough that the frame selector recommends a straight column instead, because simpler sidewall framing is worth more than the steel saved.

The saving grows with span, for the same reason everything else in this section does: moment grows with the square of the span, so the difference between following the moment diagram and ignoring it grows with it too.

What the taper costs is not money — it is a flat interior face. If racking, liner panel, masonry wainscot or a full-height partition needs to sit against the column for its full height, a tapered column will not give it to them, and buying a straight column instead is a usability premium you pay deliberately.

Planning-stage estimate calibrated to published industry ranges. Not a substitute for a stamped design by a licensed engineer. How the figures behind those percentages were derived.

Best suited to

  • Any clear span over about 60 ft
  • Weight-sensitive and cost-sensitive projects

What to watch

  • Anything that needs a plumb face against the column. Racking, liner panel, wainscot, partitions. This is the one real limitation, and it is what the straight column exists for.
  • The haunch dimension. Ask for it explicitly. It is the depth that decides clear height at the sidewall, and on wide buildings it is several feet.
  • Sidewall girt detailing. Girts frame to a face that is not vertical, so the connection detail is not the same as it would be on a straight column.
  • Interior finishes at the column. Anything wrapping the column has to follow the taper or be furred out to a plumb line, which costs more than either option looks like it should.

What it costs at each width

The widths this configuration reaches that have a page of their own, with what a clear span at that width costs and what a column line would save against it. Where the saving is meaningful, that number is the case for or against this configuration in one figure.

Tapered Column: widths covered, and the clear span cost to beat
Width Clear span steel Clear span package Modular saves What changes at this width
40 ft 2.04 – 2.97 lb/sf $13.45 – $16.33/sf Light frames. Span is rarely the cost driver at this width - eave height and snow load matter more.
60 ft 3.00 – 4.20 lb/sf $15.00 – $18.00/sf The practical floor for commercial work. Below this width, small-building suppliers price better.
80 ft 4.07 – 5.57 lb/sf $16.63 – $20.79/sf The crossover band. Clear span and modular start to diverge in cost here - price both.
100 ft 5.26 – 7.32 lb/sf $18.35 – $22.66/sf 5% Haunch depth begins to govern interior clearance. Check usable height, not just the eave.
120 ft 6.41 – 8.92 lb/sf $19.43 – $24.82/sf 9% Deep haunches and heavier anchor-bolt patterns. Foundation cost stops being a rounding error.
150 ft 8.26 – 11.56 lb/sf $21.98 – $28.57/sf 14% The practical ceiling for a standard single-span rigid frame. Past this you are buying custom engineering.
200 ft 11.55 – 16.42 lb/sf $26.85 – $35.80/sf 22% Custom engineering, shipping splices, and heavier erection equipment. Modular usually wins on cost alone.
250 ft 16.10 – 22.54 lb/sf $32.44 – $44.02/sf 28% Specialist territory. Justified by use, not economics - hangars, arenas, column-free process floors.
300 ft 21.76 – 31.28 lb/sf $39.53 – $55.11/sf 33% The upper limit most manufacturers offer. Expect a bespoke frame design and a long lead time.

Each row is priced at the case on that width's own page — the eave and length that actually get built there — so the rows are comparable to those pages rather than to each other. Planning-stage estimate calibrated to published industry ranges. Not a substitute for a stamped design by a licensed engineer.

Questions about tapered column framing

Why are metal building columns tapered?
Because bending moment in a rigid frame column is near zero at the pinned base and greatest at the knee. A web-tapered member follows that diagram, putting depth only where demand is, so nothing carries steel it does not need. It is the lightest way to cover a wide span.
Are tapered columns cheaper than straight columns?
Yes at any meaningful span, and the gap widens with width. Below about 60 ft the difference is small enough that straight columns often win anyway, because they simplify sidewall framing and give a flat interior face.
Can I put racking against a tapered column?
Not tight against it for the full height — the face is not plumb. Either accept a gap that grows toward the base, fur out to a plumb line, or specify straight columns instead and pay the weight premium for a flat face.

The other configurations

Not sure which one you need? The frame selector takes width, eave height, crane load and whether a column can stand inside, and tells you which configuration fits — and what the runner-up would have cost. Or go straight to quotes.

Advertisement