Tool
Bay spacing is the cheapest decision on a metal building to get right and one of the easiest to leave on a default. At 20 psf of ground snow, the cheapest option for this building is 25 ft bays.
| Bay | Cost index | Frames | Character |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 ft | 104.1 | 10 | Tighter frame spacing. More frames and more foundations, but the lightest purlins and girts. |
| 25 ft | 100.0 | 8 | The industry default, and the optimum for most load cases. |
| 30 ft | 102.5 | 7 | Fewer frames and fewer footings, paid for in deeper secondary framing. |
| 35 ft | 109.4 | 6 | Rarely economical. Worth pricing only on long, lightly loaded buildings. |
Why snow decides this. Primary framing and foundations get cheaper as bays get wider, because there are fewer of both. Secondary framing goes the other way: each purlin carries more roof, so it gets deeper and heavier faster than the spacing grows. Snow load sits entirely on the secondary side of that trade, so the more snow you have, the sooner wider bays stop paying.
Planning-stage estimate calibrated to published industry ranges. Not a substitute for a stamped design by a licensed engineer.
Next step
A dealer quoting from your actual geometry and load case beats any estimator, including this one. Three of them, each carrying engineer-stamped drawings for your state, cost you nothing to ask.
Get engineered quotes for a 120 × 200 × 24 ft building
Heads up: under 60 ft wide you are below the tier most commercial dealers chase. The main quote form reaches the dealers who price buildings that size every day, and it will get you more responses than this one.
The cost index above is only half the reason to think about this. Bay spacing sets the rhythm of everything attached to the sidewall.
Which is the short answer to why 25 ft became the default: it divides cleanly into common building lengths, matches typical rack and dock modules, and sits at or near the cost optimum for most of the country's snow loads.